My First Twenty-Four Hours With Windows 7

by dboynton 1/10/2009 12:21:00 PM

win7_logoThursday afternoon, I logged into my MSDN account, much like many of you did, and downloaded the beta release of Windows 7 that was announced this week during Steve Balmer's keynote address at the CES in Las Vegas. Like many of you, I've heard a lot of good things about Windows 7, from both fellow Softies and from the press (which is a refreshing change of pace) and I wanted to give it a try.

Several earlier adopters have already told me I should upgrade my main work machine to the new beta bits, that they've seen no issues. Now, it's not that I don't trust them, but I'm pretty skeptical when it comes to new versions of Windows, especially those generating as much buzz and Windows 7. So rather than run full steam ahead with a machine I depend on daily, I decided to really put the claims of Windows 7 being friendly to older, crappier hardware and pull my Toshiba M400 out of the storage room.

This is not what you would call a high-end machine. It has an Intel, dual core 2.0GHz processor with 2GB RAM. This was my primary work machine for about a year-and-a-half and spent a good amount of that time fighting with 32-bit Vista from a performance standpoint. I mean, to say it ran like a pig most of the time would be an understatement. I procured a new laptop about four months ago, a Lenovo T61p with an Intel, dual-core 2.5GHz and 4GB RAM running 64-bit Vista, that I really love, so the old m400 has been gathering dust and serving as a silicone-based crash test dummy.

Because of the hardware on the Toshiba, I decided to use the 32-bit version of Windows 7 Ultimate and burnt it off to a DVD.

Installation
Installing Windows 7 couldn't have been easier. There was an upgrade option available to me, but I decided to do a clean install (I had the M3 bits released at the PDC installed and wanted to make sure I blew any of the pre-beta stuff away). From beginning to end, the installation took about 20 minutes. Like the Vista installation experience, outside of choosing the system partition, there wasn't much for me to do but wait until the installer was done.

First Impressions
Windows 7 boots very fast. When I was running Vista on this machine, I would say that the load time averaged about 20-30 seconds. With Windows 7, I went from the BIOS screen to a blinking cursor on the login screen in about 15 seconds. So far, so good.

After logging in for the first time, my first thought was, "Wow, this looks a lot like Vista," which I happen to think is a good thing. Vista made a lot of significant improvements in the user experience with Windows, so I was glad to see they kept the "best in show" features. However, upon clicking around for about, say three seconds, I discovered there was a lot of significant changes. More on that in a bit.

Performance
The first thing I noticed when I started opening up applications was how responsive Windows 7 is. The pauses after selecting an application or double-clicking on a document that I've gotten used to in Vista over the past couple of years aren't there in Windows 7. For example, I opened Internet Explorer 8. The browser launched and rendered the MSN home page showing in less than three seconds. Later on, when I got around to installing other software, I noticed that this responsiveness was not unique to IE8.

I don't have any super sophisticated software to measure exact load times for applications in Windows, nor do I have the time to go look for some. So, I decided to run a smoke test and compare the application load times I was seeing in Windows 7 with those of Vista. After installing Visual Studio 2008 SP1 on the Windows 7 box and starting it for the first time (Visual Studio needs some customization information the first time it is launched), I rebooted both machines. Visual Studio tends to take a relatively long time to load on Vista and always has. As soon as both machines were fully booted, I went to the start menu on both machines and launched Visual Studio simultaneously.

Windows 7 beat Vista by almost six seconds. Nice!

After running several of these test on other applications, like Outlook, Excel and Sony Vegas Pro, I would posit that 32-bit Windows 7 is at least as fast as 64-bit Vista, and even faster sometimes.

UI Enhancements
The new task bar in Windows 7 is fantastic. It's pretty much par for the course for me to have several applications open at the same time, multitasker that I am. With applications like Internet Explorer that allows for multiple tabs, it's easy for me to lose track of the stuff I'm working on. To solve this problem, the new task bar in Windows 7 actually shows you thumbnails of your active applications.

Win7TaskbarThumbnails

In this example, I've got four different web sites up that I'm using. By simply moving my mouse over the IE icon in the task bar, Windows 7 shows me a thumbnail of each site. I can then move my mouse to the one I want and either go directly to it or even close it if I need to. Also, these four web sites are in multiple tabs in two separate browser sessions. With one click of the mouse, I can get to exactly what I want.

Win7Gadgets Another thing I like about the new UI is gadget management. I always thought that the sidebar in Vista was a very cool idea and I used my all the time, but having everything imprisoned in the sidebar was kind of a pain. In Windows 7, you can move those gadgets wherever you like on the desktop. Again, a small feature, but from the user experience perspective, it's giving me control of my environment, which is important when you spend as much time in front of a computer as I do.

Other new UI enhancements that I really like are:

  • Jump Lists: Move your mouse over an application icon in the task bar and right-click with the mouse. This will show you a list recent documents you've accessed via that application. This is extremely handy with applications like Word, Excel, Adobe Photoshop, Visual Studio and Expression Blend.
  • Windows Docking: Do you ever have to compare information in two different windows, like when you're comparison shopping online? Windows 7 will automatically dock these windows for you. All you do is click and drag one window off to one side of the screen and do the same for the other window on the opposite side of the screen. Viola! And the best part is that, when you undock the windows, they go back to their original size.
  • Window Transparency: If you have an application shortcut or gadget on your desk top that you want to see, just drag your mouse to the lower right-hand corner of the screen and all the open windows become transparent, allowing you to look at your desktop. If you need to get to something on your desktop, just click the mouse in the same place and all your windows get minimized.

User Access Control and Security
Arguably one of the least liked features of Vista, the intrusiveness of User Access Control (UAC) in Windows 7 has been toned down considerably. Philosophically, I doubt anyone could argue with the intent of Vista implementation of OS level security. It isn't just marketing fluff that Vista is the most secure version of Windows ever released. That being said, I think of UAC like the TSA staff at the airport security line: They may be annoying and intrusive, but ultimately they're there for your protection.

My initial impression of UAC in Windows 7 is that the product team "right sized" it. For example, I didn't get a single UAC nag when I was installing software on Windows 7 from a local source. It just did what I asked it to do. The first application I tried to install from the web, though, needed a confirmation from me to continue. That seems to me very reasonable. If I'm installing software from a DVD I've had for years, Windows shouldn't worry too much about that -- I know it's safe. Double checking when I'm attempting to install something from a web site, that's something that we all need.

Overall, what I've seen is a significant decrease in unnecessary and duplicated UAC prompts, making the prompts that I do get more visible and impactful.

Software and Hardware Compatibility
As you'll recall, I mentioned that I wanted to fully vet Windows 7 before taking the move of replacing Vista on my work machine. If that machine is down, I'm in trouble. Besides evaluating the performance and stability of Windows 7, I wanted to make sure that all the software and hardware devices I use on a daily basis would continue to work.

screenshot_devicesYesterday afternoon, I finished installing the last piece of software on the M400, essentially making it a mirror of my Lenovo. I've opened and, to varying degrees, used all the applications I'd installed and didn't experience one problem. Everything I have installed on my Vista machine not only work on Windows 7, but they all load considerably faster. In fact, since I'm planning to install Windows 7 on my home machines as well, I check and yes, World of Warcraft runs on Windows 7 as well.

Also this afternoon, I hooked up my Zune, the HP Laserjet printer in my home office, my Samsung i760 cell phone and my Nikon D70 digital camera to the M400, all of which installed right away and worked the first time. Windows 7 uses the same device driver model as Vista, ensuring that if your device works on Vista, it will work on Windows 7. It also appears that Windows 7 has at least the same number of device drivers that Vista SP1 has, so whatever you're using will likely install without issues.

And actually, that's another cool thing about Windows 7: The new Devices and Printers screen. Essentially, Windows 7 provides access and configuration options to all the attached devices on your system in one location.

Memory Footprint
So far, everything I've seen in Windows 7 has really impressed me. The one thing I wasn't really excited about was the base memory footprint of the OS. When I saw Steve Sinofsky's keynote at PDC in October, it was specifically mentioned that the notoriously large memory footprint of Vista would be reduced in Windows 7. The M400 is running fine with Windows 7 as it has 2GB of RAM, but this might cause problems for my daughters' laptops, as they only have 1GB of RAM a piece.

I'm running the standard installation package and haven't had a chance to dig in and see what is actually running in the background. That will be one of the next things I evaluate. My hope is, now that the feature set for Windows 7 is pretty well locked in, the product team will focus on reducing this footprint by RTM. In fact, not even knowing if it's possible, it would be great to see this down around the 200MB mark that Windows XP had. Hey, a guy can dream, can't he?

In Conclusion...
Overall, I'm really excited  about what I'm seeing with Windows 7 these first twenty-four hours. I've found a few "interesting" items that I think are probably bugs that should be taken care of by RTM. In fact, the beta has a ubiquitous means of reporting these issues. Just about every Windows 7 window has a link in the upper right hand corner inviting you to Send Feedback.

The Windows 7 beta was made available for public download yesterday afternoon. I highly encourage you to go download it and evaluate it for yourself. You can download it from here. Also, please feel free to share any of your favorite or not-so-favorite features of Windows 7 in the comments section below. I'd love to hear from you!

Technorati Tags:

Currently rated 4.6 by 5 people

  • Currently 4.6/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Windows 7

Related posts

Comments

1/10/2009 1:48:28 PM

Eric Brown

Hey Denny,

I installed Windows 7 as well, but I noticed that my windows Experience index for the Primary Hard Disk was LOWER on Windows 7 than on Vista. On Vista it is 5.9, but on Windows 7 it is 3.0. Curious . . . was wondering if that is one of the oddities of the beta? Is your Windows Experience Index better or lower on Windows 7 vs Vista?

Eric Brown us

1/10/2009 2:16:56 PM

dboynton

Hey, Eric. Actually, the experience index on the M400 is 2, which is the same as it was with Vista. Interestingly, Windows 7 is performing so much better on that same hardware, I didn't even look until I saw your comment. One example, though somewhat trivial, I could never use the application "flip" feature in Vista -- it was just too slow. It works as well on Windows 7 as it does on my 64-bit Vista monster machine. So, I think the index rating might be skewed somehow. Mention it via the "Send Feedback" link.

dboynton us

1/10/2009 5:32:30 PM

pingback

Pingback from blogs.msdn.com

US ISV Developer Evangelism Team : Report on the First 24 Hours with Windows 7

blogs.msdn.com

1/10/2009 8:59:37 PM

Joe Enos

My biggest beef is that they got rid of the QuickLaunch toolbar on the taskbar. I use it constantly in real life, with dozens of icons that I actually use. For them to just take it away is uncalled for - even if it's not there by default, it should be an option to re-add (without registry hacks or other fancy techniques like I've read).

I'm also not a big fan of the replacement, pinning icons to the taskbar. Once you open it, your launcher is replaced, so you can't open a second instance. That's also something that is fairly common (for example, opening two notepads or calculators).

Joe Enos us

1/10/2009 10:15:02 PM

dboynton

Hey, Joe. I see what you're saying about the quick launch bar -- I'm a frequent user as well. That being said, I didn't have a problem with losing it because of the ability to pin applications to the task bar, but that's just my personal preference.

GREAT POINT about the lack of ability to launch a second instance of an application from the task bar. I just noticed that for the first time this morning when I tried to launch a second instance of IE8. Be sure to send that feedback into the team. I'll join you in that!

dboynton us

1/11/2009 7:29:12 AM

Vinod Kumar

Joe - You can just right click the taskbar launch icon and select a new instance.

Most interesting thing with the Launch Icon is with IE8 for example shows a list of previous sites visited. A really neat stuff ...

Vinod Kumar

Vinod Kumar in

1/11/2009 7:42:47 AM

Busby SEO Test

i think Windows 7 is a good one, thanks for sharing you thought about windows 7

Busby SEO Test us

1/11/2009 9:58:52 AM

dboynton

Vinod - Thanks for posting on that. I just noticed that this morning. Also, for everyone else out there, a key piece of advice I can give you is, "When in doubt, right-click." For example, adding gadjets to your desktop is now accomplished by right-clicking on on the desktop.

I also really like that the jump lists for IE8 show your browsing history. Very, very cool.

dboynton us

1/11/2009 10:31:49 AM

Tim Anderson

There doesn't seem to be any way to have your gadgets always visible now the sidebar is gone? That strikes me as an oversight.

Tim

Tim Anderson gb

1/11/2009 10:41:01 AM

dboynton

Actually Tim, right click on the gadjet and select the "Always on top" option. That will make it visible regardless of what other applications you're working in. If it's too obtrusive, there is also an opacity selector so it can still be on top but not in the way. Will that get you what you want, or did you like the sidebar realstate.

dboynton us

1/11/2009 2:59:18 PM

Tim Anderson

Danny

Thanks - though if you do that, your gadget is now likly obscuring the current app. I liked the sidebar which keeps them out of the way but visible.

Tim

Tim Anderson gb

1/12/2009 4:02:17 AM

pingback

Pingback from dotnet.org.za

Windows 7 Beta - The Curtain Raiser

dotnet.org.za

1/13/2009 6:03:31 AM

Jason

I just wanted to comment on your worry about the memory footprint. You noted that your running windows 7 on a 2gig laptop with a 2ghz processor. Im an avid fan of trying new software, and like many i have downloaded Windows 7 beta to see what the hype is all about. I run Windows Vista 64bit on a Quad 2.4ghz with 4gigs of Ram. I love vista and always have and didn't want to install a fresh or upgrade to Windows 7 without first testing it.

My girlfriends laptop is 3-4 years old. It has a 1.7ghz centrino processor and 512MBs Ram. It had been running XP 32bit the whole time until last night. I freshly installed Windows 7 with out a glitch. Its running better than XP has been, when i check the cpu and memory usage when idol, it shows cpu at 1% and the momory at 68%. It runs amazingly fast compared to XP. I would imagine the more Ram your machine has the more it will utilise it in the same way it did with Vista. But unlike Vista which did suffer on 1gig Windows 7 seems to fly.

Jason gb

1/13/2009 10:44:31 AM

dboynton

Hey, Jason. I guessing you're right in that Win7, like Vista, takes the memory that's available and reallocates as needed. Since this post, I've updated another laptop with 1GB of RAM and the performance is still great, even with several applications open. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

dboynton us

1/13/2009 10:45:57 AM

dboynton

Tim,

I think that's the purpose of the opacity meter on each gadget, so it can sit over an application and not be intrusive. However, it ultimately comes back to personal preference. Perhaps that ideal solution would be to allow the user to put the sidebar back on the desktop and run in legacy mode.

dboynton us

1/15/2009 7:53:09 AM

Vinod Kumar

Now I am getting a pulse of this Win7 ... This is so cool with lower memory pressure.

Coming back to the conversation thread on the old Quick Launch bar, you can still have it by right click on taskbar -> Toolbars -> New Toolbars -> Goto %your profile%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer and select the Folder. You get the good old toolbar.

And to reduce the number of clicks for new IE instance, just use Shift+IE Icon (from taskbar) will do the trick. Or if it has been already pinned and in default location use WinKey+1 will start a new instance.

Vinod Kumar in

1/15/2009 9:09:33 AM

dboynton

Vinod,

Great find, and I like how it just adds it to the context menu so you can turn it back off of you want. This was number 13 on Tim Sneath's post I highlighted yesterday as well. Thank you for taking the time to share!

Also, Win+n opens the pinned application in that spot. For example, if Media Player is in the third application in line pinned to my task bar, then Win+3 will launch a new instance. I'm using this all the time now.

dboynton us

1/15/2009 11:03:07 PM

Vinod Kumar

What I dont understand is once you disable this, it disappears from the context menu Frown ... We need to go through the process again. Still figuring this out ...

Vinod Kumar in

1/21/2009 8:12:41 PM

pingback

Pingback from jcstame.wordpress.com

Windows 7 (Beta) is here! « Percipio - John C. Stame’s Blog

jcstame.wordpress.com

7/13/2009 8:32:50 PM

club penguin cheats

My windows Experience index for the Primary Hard Disk was LOWER on Windows 7 than on Vista. On Vista it is 5.9, but on Windows 7 it is 3.0. Curious . . . was wondering if that is one of the oddities of the beta?

club penguin cheats us

7/14/2009 1:42:45 AM

Music Careers

There's a lot of stuff in there. Thanks for sharing this post

Music Careers us

7/14/2009 12:13:43 PM

homeserve

RIP Vista and roll on Windows 7 I say - shame that the upgrade pricing is such an issue in Europe.

homeserve

7/28/2009 4:44:59 AM

Wholesale Perfume

This article if full of great information.I have been also using Windows 7 for couple of months and so far had no troubles.But I truly appreciate the important tips mentioned in this article and hope someday I may also need this too.Thanks for the great piece of share.

Wholesale Perfume us

8/12/2009 1:30:27 AM

seo

Can i have both windows XP and Windows 7 Beta OS together with an option to chose at start? (like XP and 2000)????????

seo us

8/12/2009 9:23:10 AM

dboynton

Yes, you can setup dual boot mode, just like with previous versions of Windows. There is also an XP compatability mode you can launch from within Windows 7 if your having application compatibility issues. Trust me, once you get on to Windows 7, you won't want to go back to XP.

dboynton

8/17/2009 9:03:37 PM

Cameron

ive had windows 7 for almost a month and a half i love it it runs 10x faster than vista ever could i haven't had an error message once it takes second to start up and shut down, this is going to be a good one lol suck it steve jobs XD

Cameron ca

8/31/2009 8:11:49 PM

Alice

I haven't tried it yet, but I plan to do so. Windows 7 seems to get much improved from Vista. One day, I switched from XP to Vista, but found out that there are so many bugs. Then, I switched back and still use XP since now. Probably, if Windows 7 is good and stable enough, I'll turn to it.

Alice us

9/7/2009 11:46:14 AM

wines

windows 7 is superb but it also has some problems as it is always shutting down for every two hours.

wines tr

9/8/2009 1:40:01 AM

generic viagra online

The critical mass of OSX users are the people who will be buying new and expensive PC's over the next generation: they're in college right now. I'd love to see the actual data, but Apple's saturation on college campuses is much, much deeper than in older age brackets. And once all of those consumers get out of college, watch out Microsoft.

generic viagra online us

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.3.0.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the author

Denny Boynton Denny Boynton
Microsoft Architect Evangelist by day, wannabe rock 'n roll star by night! Want more? Here's my bio.

E-mail me Send mail

    follow me on Twitter


    Calendar

    <<  February 2012  >>
    MoTuWeThFrSaSu
    303112345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728291234
    567891011

    View posts in large calendar

    Recent comments

    Authors

    Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    © Copyright 2012, Denny Boynton

    Sign in